人材検索について

ハイパフォーマンススポーツに係る研究者やサポートスタッフ等の人材情報の検索ができます。HPSCに現在勤務する職員(HPSCスタッフ)、HPSCの勤務経験者(HPSC OB/OG)、HPSCの各種事業における協力者(HPSC事業協力者)のカテゴリーに分けております。人材データベースへのご登録はHPSCからご依頼させて頂いた方のみとしております。

最終更新日:2026/04/08

永田 直也

ナガタ ナオヤ (Naoya Nagata)
論文
タイトル
大学体育実技におけるルーブリックを導入したパフォーマンス評価の実践:チームスポーツに着目して
タイトル(英)
Implementation of rubric-based performance assessment in university practical physical education: Focusing on team sports
参照URL
https://researchmap.jp/naoya.nagata/published_papers/51634850
著者
寺岡 英晋,東原 綾子,村山 光義,永田 直也,福士 徳文,稲見 崇孝,奥山 靜代,佐々木 玲子,清水 花菜
著者(英)
Teraoka, E.,Higashihara, A.,Murayama, M.,Nagata, N.,Fukushi, N.,Inami, T.,Okuyama, S.,Sasaki, R.,Shimizu, K.
担当区分
概要
The aim of the present study was to qualitatively analyze the implementation of rubric-based performance assessment within university practical physical education, highlighting its advantages and challenges. In higher education, the need for visible learning outcomes has drawn attention to rubrics as a tool for ensuring transparency and consistency in performance assessment. In particular, the grading of practical physical education has often been subject to individual teacher discretion, raising concerns over the lack of clarity in assessment criteria. On the other hand, rubrics are considered effective for ensuring the quality of learning outcomes by offering a multifaceted assessment of student performance and achievements. This study employed the CIPP model (Context, Input, Process, Product) as a theoretical framework to analyze the responses of both students and teachers to the introduction of rubrics in practical physical education classes. Semi-structured interviews with the authors and focus group interviews with students were conducted at one university, focusing on 3 different forms of practical physical education, and the data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. The findings indicated that rubrics had a key advantage of clarifying grading criteria, enabling students to understand the course objectives better and offering them more opportunities to improve their learning outcomes through selfassessment. Additionally, rubrics served as an effective tool for teachers, allowing them to adjust their teaching in line with the evaluation criteria and provide structured feedback to students. On the other hand, challenges were identified, such as the abstract nature of some of the rubric criteria, which made them difficult for certain students to understand. In particular, assessment of skills such as followership and collaboration was considered complex. Furthermore, instructors reported that they had limited time to offer sufficient feedback during the course, leading to a lack of mutual understanding of the assessment criteria between teachers and students. The present study findings are significant in demonstrating that rubric-based performance assessment can promote active learning and enhance fairness and transparency in the grading process of practical physical education. Future challenges include the need to establish a more robust feedback system to ensure that both instructors and students fully understand and effectively utilize the rubric criteria. Additionally, it is important to create a flexible rubric framework that accommodates diverse learning styles and encourages creativity in student performance.
概要(英)
The aim of the present study was to qualitatively analyze the implementation of rubric-based performance assessment within university practical physical education, highlighting its advantages and challenges. In higher education, the need for visible learning outcomes has drawn attention to rubrics as a tool for ensuring transparency and consistency in performance assessment. In particular, the grading of practical physical education has often been subject to individual teacher discretion, raising concerns over the lack of clarity in assessment criteria. On the other hand, rubrics are considered effective for ensuring the quality of learning outcomes by offering a multifaceted assessment of student performance and achievements. This study employed the CIPP model (Context, Input, Process, Product) as a theoretical framework to analyze the responses of both students and teachers to the introduction of rubrics in practical physical education classes. Semi-structured interviews with the authors and focus group interviews with students were conducted at one university, focusing on 3 different forms of practical physical education, and the data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. The findings indicated that rubrics had a key advantage of clarifying grading criteria, enabling students to understand the course objectives better and offering them more opportunities to improve their learning outcomes through selfassessment. Additionally, rubrics served as an effective tool for teachers, allowing them to adjust their teaching in line with the evaluation criteria and provide structured feedback to students. On the other hand, challenges were identified, such as the abstract nature of some of the rubric criteria, which made them difficult for certain students to understand. In particular, assessment of skills such as followership and collaboration was considered complex. Furthermore, instructors reported that they had limited time to offer sufficient feedback during the course, leading to a lack of mutual understanding of the assessment criteria between teachers and students. The present study findings are significant in demonstrating that rubric-based performance assessment can promote active learning and enhance fairness and transparency in the grading process of practical physical education. Future challenges include the need to establish a more robust feedback system to ensure that both instructors and students fully understand and effectively utilize the rubric criteria. Additionally, it is important to create a flexible rubric framework that accommodates diverse learning styles and encourages creativity in student performance.
出版者・発行元
一般社団法人 日本体育・スポーツ・健康学会
出版者・発行元(英)
Japan Society of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences
誌名
体育学研究
誌名(英)
Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences
70
開始ページ
521
終了ページ
540
出版年月
2025年
査読の有無
査読有り
招待の有無
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
ISSN
0484-6710
DOI URL
https://doi.org/10.5432/jjpehss.34-24093
共同研究・競争的資金等の研究課題